TRINet Blog

TRINet Newsletter April 2015 +  


Building Back Better +  

TRINet Newsletter March 2015 +  


Protection of Coastal Areas from Rising Sea Level

Recently released Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggests that global mean sea level has risen by 190 mm over the period 1901-2010.


The Road to Sendai +  

The first time many of us heard of Disaster Risk Reduction was probably in 2005, a month after the tsunami struck. The World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction held at Kobe, Japan, adopted the Hyogo Framework of Action 2005-2015.
This was the time when post-tsunami reconstruction of the affected areas had begun – people were being moved into temporary shelters and discussions about rebuilding houses was going on full swing. The tsunami was an unexpected, new threat from the sea, an addition to the cyclones and storm surges. How did one ensure people’s safety by the sea?

The announcement of HFA’s three strategic goals at this time was thus most appropriate: The integration of disaster risk reduction into sustainable development policies and planning; Development and strengthening of institutions, mechanisms and capacities to build resilience to hazards and the systematic incorporation of risk reduction approaches into the implementation of emergency preparedness, response and recovery programmes. Ah, here were directions that could be followed. Thus, Slowly, wherever possible, these ideas were integrated into the rebuilding process. For example, multi-hazard resilient houses were built and Early Warning Systems were put in place. There were a number of sessions conducted by NGOs with communities where PRAs helped the locals (and the outsiders) understand threats, risks and methods to build a resilient society.

In 2008, BEDROC carried out a study to look at the state of disaster resilience among tsunami affected communities using a framework created by John Twigg with reference to the HFA’s five thematic areas for disaster resilience. One of the most obvious findings was that there was a heightened awareness of disasters and the need for disaster preparedness. But it still continued to be top down rather than a bottom up approach in terms of building disaster resilience.

TRINet Newsletter February 2015 +  

Scientist alleges illegal export of Rs.1 lakh crore beach minerals from TN

An accomplished ocean scientist, who explored the entire coast of the country for sea minerals at the Centre's behest, has filed a PIL in the Madras high court saying rare beach sand minerals worth at least 1 lakh crore had been illegally exported from Tamil Nadu with the connivance of central and state agencies and officers.


Influencing Decisions +  

It appears now that final decisions on environmental clearances depend more on political directives than the environmental impact assessment reports. This means that, if you want to protect the environment, it is extremely important to influence the right politicians. How is this best done? A major player is the media, by highlighting issues that are likely to have extensive adverse impacts on the environment. Prithi Nambiar’s study “Media Construction of Environment and Sustainability in India” takes a look at this.


TRINet Newsletter January 2015 +  

 10 yrs after tsunami, India still needs to fill in disaster management gaps

"We never knew the ocean could leap towards us in such a way," says Chettiar, the well-known face of Swept, a documentary film on the tsunami. Ten years later, India looks better prepared although some serious gaps remain.

Moving Forward +  

Memorial services, reminiscences and analyses marked the tenth anniversary of the 2004 tsunami disaster. The focus of many of the articles in the media has been on the improved early warning systems and better preparedness. 

TRINet Newsletter December 2014 +  

The Tenth Anniversary +  

This month we observe the 10th anniversary of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. A lot of change has happened along the coast. We have learnt a lot too in the last ten years and our attitude towards disasters has changed.

Disbelief and shock – two prominent responses when the news about the tsunami hitting the coast first came in. Some of the images are still fresh in mind – the disbelief that on a warm clear day, there were reports of water entering coastal hamlets. How could that be when there was no cyclone in the offing? The rush towards the coast with relief supplies as the scale of destruction got known. The initial chaos followed by coordination and organized response.

What have we learnt in the last decade?
First of all, that a phenomenon called ‘tsunami’ exists. That it is a wave generated (most often) by an undersea earthquake. That tsunamis have hit the Indian coasts many times in the past, but memory being what it is, few remember such rare events. That we can be forewarned about tsunamis – Early Warning Systems have been set up for the Indian Ocean region and have been able to forecast accurately whether we will or won’t be hit by a tsunami when there is an undersea earthquake near Indonesia. The latest proof was just two days ago when a 7.1 magnitude earthquake occurred under the Molucca Sea near Halmahera in Indonesia. Yes, initially we were sceptical – we did not trust the ability of buoys in the deep sea to be able to give us adequate warning. But looks like things have settled down and people have become a little trusting of the ITEWS.